2 Designing an India Pavilion at Disney’s EPCOT

Can Cultural Sensitivity and Commercial Success Coexist?

  • What is EPCOT?
    • Concept & History
      EPCOT (Experimental Prototype City of Tomorrow) is one of four theme parks at Walt Disney World in Orlando, Florida.

      EPCOT is unique in that it is the most realistic of all of the Disney parks, and was the special brainchild of Walt Disney himself. Walt had always been interested in urban planning and was inspired by his many travels across different cultures. He designed EPCOT as a hub and spoke model residential complex, with a neighborhood in the outer rim populated by clusters of cultural communities, and a more cosmopolitan town center/commercial area would unite them in the middle. Walt imagined trains running through the park connecting the communities together and making it easy to access each other.

      However, Walt died five years before construction ever began at EPCOT. Without Walt to lead them, Imagineers re-designed EPCOT using fragments of Walt’s original idea, but shifted the goal of EPCOT from a residential complex to a full fledged theme park. Imagineers wanted EPCOT to be a symbol of the powers of mankind: a showcase of technology, scientific discovery and international culture. These ideas are what influenced the actual construction of the park.

      Today, EPCOT is split into two parts: Future World (which focuses on the technological achievements of mankind and the idea of space exploration) and The World Showcase (a permanent World’s Fair). This project will focus on EPCOT’s World Showcase.

       

  • Why Does This Project Matter?
    According to a Disney Parks Report in 2019, “EPCOT hosted 12.44 million guests, ranking it the fourth most visited theme park in North America and the second most visited in the world.” For many loyal guests of Walt Disney World, EPCOT may be the only exposure to international cultures they ever get, and the park forms the basis for their understanding of the represented cultures. Overheard at the park quotes from guests include: “This is basically like being in Mexico!” or “This Chinese food is so authentic!”. These expressions of excitement from guests are a manufactured product of Imagineers. Disney promotes EPCOT as an “authentic” experience, meant to “provide guests with the feeling of actually going to (some of these) destinations without ever leaving the comfort of Disney World.”

    However, what EPCOT fails to acknowledge in its marketing is the principle of “staged authenticity” that the park is built on. Staged authenticity refers to a stylized recreation of something real to make guests think they are actually in the real place (Milman, 2013). It is not the same thing as real authenticity, which is an actual rendition of what a place looks, sounds, and feels like at the present moment of time (Milman, 2013).

    There is a danger in promoting a theme park that is intentionally designed with commercial and entertainment purposes as an authentic experience of an entire culture. This project digs into the differences between aesthetics (as it is used in “staged authenticity”) and real authenticity. In this project, I probe the question: is it possible to design an EPCOT pavilion in a way that is both culturally sensitive and commercially successful? Can these two goals work together in harmony? Should they?

  • Digging into The World Showcase
    • Design of The World Showcase
      EPCOT’s World Showcase was inspired by the concept of the World’s Fair – an international exhibition in the late 1900s that showcased the achievements of participating countries. The World Showcase features 11 different nations in the form of pavilions. Much like the different lands in Disney’s Magic Kingdom Theme Park, each country’s pavilion is differentiated by sensory elements: architectural and spatial details, music, cuisine, live performances, and themed attractions/merchandise. The pavilions fill the circumference of the World Showcase Lagoon – a man made lake where Harmonious (EPCOT’s night time fireworks show) plays daily.
    • Design of National Pavilions
      In contrast to Future World (which is meant to transport guests into the future), the World Showcase is designed to immerse guests into a more historical, ancient experience of the countries featured. Imagineers did this by constructing each pavilion with “themed architecture, landscapes, streetscapes, attractions, shops, and restaurants representing each country’s culture and cuisine (Disney Parks Website).” Many pavilions also feature themed rides, shows, and live entertainment.The 11 pavilions are: Canada, UK, France, Morocco, Japan, USA, Italy, Germany, China, Norway, and Mexico.

 

  • Issues with The World Showcase
    • Financing and Representation 
      So who actually sponsors these pavilions?During the initial stages of EPCOT’s construction, Disney executives reached out to the governments of over thirty countries for pavilion sponsorship. The company felt that the request for sponsorship was an opportunity for  national governments to introduce the culture of their country and promote tourism within the American audience. Baked into the request for full sponsorship, Disney also offered creative rights to work with Imagineers regarding the design of the pavilions (Sehlinger, 2014). However, every single one of the thirty governments that Disney reached out to (except Morocco) denied the request for sponsorship due to political, cultural, or economic reasons. With lack of financial support from national governments, Disney turned to corporate organizations to fundraise the $800 million it took to build EPCOT (Sehlinger, 2014). Today, every single national pavilion at EPCOT (except Morocco) is sponsored by a corporate organization.Corporate financing provided Disney Imagineers with abundant resources to build out all the little details of EPCOT that make the theme park a true Disney experience for guests. But the fact that the funding for EPCOT comes from corporations leads to two major ethical problems. The fact that fundraising comes from corporate sponsorship presents two ethical issues (Sehlinger, 2014):

      • One, it limits the countries featured to a very specific list of companies who are willing to sponsor a pavilion. Most of these companies are business partners of Disney, resulting in skewed representation and a significant lack of diversity in the national pavilions (7 of the 11 pavilions at EPCOT are Western/European countries).
      • Two, with sponsorship coming from corporate organizations, the responsibility for design of the pavilions was left to Imagineers. There was no higher authority to approve the design of national pavilions. This means that what you see when you walk into EPCOT is Disney’s interpretation of these international cultures – not the culture itself. This disclaimer is never made to guests upon entering the park.

 

    • Aesthetics vs. Authenticity  
      • In Tourism Scholarship:
        • An Aesthetic Experience: one that is curated to stimulate our sensory and symbolic dimensions in a pleasing way. Anything that is consumed in “the context of a themed experience: architecture, exterior landscapes, interior environments, cultural artifacts, products, photographs, advertisements, clothing, costumes, music, paintings, cultural performances and actors,” are considered aesthetic details (Houston, 2011).
        • An Authentic Experience: can also be curated, but it does not have to be pleasing. It is not stylized or caricatured – rather, it is an accurate depiction of the physical and cultural elements of a region. It includes real sensory details, the traditions associated with cultural artifacts, and exposure to the daily lived experience of locals.
      • In the context of Disney’s EPCOT:
        • Disney’s EPCOT aims for “staged authenticity:” the recreation of a real thing that is meant to make guests feel like they may be in the real place itself. According to a report on Aesthetics vs. Authenticity at Disney’s EPCOT, “the World Showcase at Disney’s EPCOT uses aesthetics to create a particular experience of the world of a bygone era for those who visit (Houston, 2011).”
        • Imagineers designed the pavilions by mapping the topography of identities, memories, places, practices, and discourses that they argue tourists normally undertake as they travel. But this approach does not provide an authentic experience – only an aesthetic one. One could argue that EPCOT is designed not as an international showcase, but the world as it is seen through the eyes of American tourists.
  • @ Mexico Pavilion: Architectural replica of Chichen Itza that originally had a mall inside. This caused controversy within the Mexican community because many people believed it was not an authentic exposure to what you would see if you walked into Mexico City today. Imagineers decided to incorporate a night time market inside the temple modeled after a real Mexican market to ground the pavilion in some form of reality.
 

  • @ China Pavilion: Includes an architectural replica of the Forbidden Palace lined with Terracotta warriors on the outside, again with retail interiors. Outside live performances of Chinese dragon puppets come out in timed rotations without any greater context to when these kinds of performances usually occur.
  • @ USA Pavilion: biggest pavilion at EPCOT, colonial architecture with designs from actual buildings at the time. Inside there are few retail stores, primarily an ode to American history that completely sanitizes darker elements of American past, like slavery and other injustices.

 

  • Of course, one can argue that no one spends money on an EPCOT park ticket to read about depressing racial injustices. But in the context of a themed “educational and authentic” experience such as EPCOT, an illusion of authenticity is built off of aesthetic, hyper-real details and a sanitized re-telling of history that isn’t always accurate. This caricature of real cultures is meant to trigger guests into a mindset of consumption rather than immersion.
  • According to Houston, many critics of “Disney-fication” of society point to the danger posed by the staged authenticity of EPCOT that leads guests to believe that what they are seeing at each pavilion is a true cultural experience.
  • But it is not. It is Disney’s interpretation of history and these cultures for the purpose of entertainment and commercialism rather than education and cultural immersion.
  • Reimagining the World Showcase: Building an India Pavilion
    • What are we really trying to showcase?
      • If this pavilion were designed the typical Disney way, there would no doubt be an emphasis on the “touristy,” more commercially popular landmarks of India, like the Taj Mahal. The goal of this project is not to create a pavilion that is out of place at EPCOT, but one that retains the same spirit of cultural exposure and immersion while also being self aware of its shortcomings.
      • The Challenge: How might we design a Disney EPCOT India Pavilion to retain elements of entertainment and Disney IP while still educating guests on what an authentic experience of Indian culture might look like?
    • Layout (Architecture and Setting)
  • India is a large country, with many different geographic and cultural regions. To showcase each one would be impossible, but the goal of the pavilion would be to pay homage to the diversity of India’s natural and architectural wonders.
  • This Pavilion would be broken down in three parts. The main draw would be the facade of the Taj Mahal —  a clear and obvious symbol of Indian culture in tourist culture. However, the pavilion would also feature two other settings. One, a walkway through the lush forests of Kerala (Jungle Book themed), which would also be home to the live performance stage. Two, a covered street market with food (chaat) vendors, jewelry shops, and textile stalls. These are some of the main exports of India, so the street market would be a tribute to that.

 

1) Taj Mahal Façade

2) Jungle Book inspired Kerala Forest 3) Covered Street Market with Food and Textile Vendors
    • Music (and other sensory stimulus)
    • One of the main sensory cues Disney uses to let guests know they have entered a new part of the park is music. At EPCOT, each pavilion is demarcated not only by a change in architecture, but also a change in music and smells. For example, the sound of bamboo flutes and gongs echo through the Chinese pavilion. And no one can deny the unmistakable smell of funnel cake and turkey legs in the USA pavilion.
    • India is known for its rich culture of music. Again, showcasing all the different types of music from India would be impossible, but a soothing flute and sitar melody would be a key element of the pavilion.
    • As far as smells, the delicious chat cooking in the street market should provide the same savory aroma a toursit would experience walking down the crowded streets of Delhi. However, the fragrance of jasmine flowers and marigolds will provide guests with the calmness and sense of beauty that comes with a visit to South India.
    • Cuisine
      • Food is one of the most important elements of Indian culture. The most exciting part about Indian food is that most of it is vegetarian, and there are many delicious vegan options. Having an authentic menu at the India EPCOT pavilion would be a key draw for guests.
      • Chaat is one of the most common types of street food found in India. The word Chaat comes from the word “chatna,” which means “to lick” as the food items are  typically salty, sweet, and tangy, and are known to ignite different sensations of the tongue. Different types of chaat items originated in different parts of India, so it is a good representation of the multi-culutral elements that make up Indian cuisine.
    • Menu items:
      • Aloo Chaat (spicy parboiled potato with chutney, from Northwest India)
      • Bhelpuri (a soggy sweet treat of puffed ruce, chopped onions, and chutney, from Mumbai)
      • Dahi Puri (crispy shells stuffed with potato and chickpea mixture and drizzled with yogurt and chutney, served all across India)
      • Pakora (deep fried onion or paneer fritters with chutney to dip, served all across India)
      • Mango Lassi (sweet mango flavored yogurt drink, served all across India)
    • Live Performances 
      • Live performances are a dynamic and interactive way for guests to engage with the culture first hand. One of the goals of this pavilion is to create an array of live performance shows that do not caricature the culture of the country, but rather highlight the diversity and beauty of Indian art. This pavilion will have a rotation of three live performances throughout the day:
  • Bharathanatyam – Dance Performance
    • Bharathanatyam is a popular form of Indian classical dance that originated in Tamilnadu (South India). It is known for its intense technique, foot work, and expressive style. Bharathantyam dancers typically train for decades and wear colorful costumes made from the textiles of their region.
Bharata Natyam Performance
  • Sitar and tabla concert – Classical Music Concert
    • Indian classical music has roots from all over the continent. It is rooted in two foundational concepts: raga (melody) and tala (rhythm). Indian classical music features more notes than western music, which is showcased by the range on the sitar.
  • Rangoli making – Interactive Art Show
    • Rangoli is an art form that originated in South India, in which patterns are created on a flat surface using colorful powders made from lime stone, dry rice flour, quartz, colored sand, and flower petals. Rangoli is a symbol of happiness and positivity within a household, and is typically done in front of the doorstep or entryway of a home every morning by the women of the house. This Rangoli-making live performance will teach guests how to make their own and the significance behind the art.
A Little girl making Rangoli and decorating with Oil lamps for Diwali celebration in India.

 

References:

  • Houston, H. R., and Meamber, Laurie A. “Consuming the ‘world’: reflexivity, aesthetics, and authenticity at Disney World’s EPCOT Center.” Consumption Markets & Culture, vol. 14, no. 2. 2011, pp. 177-91.
  • Imagineers. The Imagineering Field Guide to Epcot at Walt Disney World. New York: Disney Editions, 2006. Print.
  • Milman, Ady. “Guest’s perception of staged authenticity in a theme park: an example from Disney’s Epcot’s World Showcase.” Tourism Review, vol. 68, no. 4, 2013, pp. 71-89.
  • Sehlinger, Bob, and Testa, Len. The Unofficial Guide to Walt Disney World 2014. Birmingham: Keen Communications, 2014. Print.
  • Sheppard, Randal. “Mexico Goes to Disney World: Recognizing and Representing Mexico at EPCOT Center’s Mexico Pavilion.” Latin American Research Review, vol. 51, no. 3, 2016, pp. 64-84. Print.

License

Icon for the CC0 (Creative Commons Zero) license

To the extent possible under law, Jody Valentine has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to Archaeology & Society, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book