References

Alkin, M., & Christie, C. (2004). An evaluation theory tree. In Evaluation roots (pp. 13–65). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984157.n2

Anderson, L. W., and Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.

Association of American Colleges and Universities. (n.d.). VALUE rubrics. https://www.aacu.org/value-rubrics

Bamberger, M., Vaessen, J., & Raimondo, E. (Eds.). (2016). Dealing with complexity in development evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781483399935

Banta, T. W., & Palomba C. A. (2015). Assessment essentials: Planning, implementing, and improving assessment in higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education. ISBN-10:1118903323

Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.

Bryk, A. S, Gomez, L.M., Grunow, A., & LeMahieu, P. G. (2015). Learning to improve: How American’s schools can bet better at getting better. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Press. ISBN 678-1-61250-791-0

Campus Labs. (2021.) Equity-Centered Assessment: Embedding equity throughout the assessment cycle. https://assessmentinstitute.iupui.edu/overview/institute-files/2020-institute/tuesday-2020/lundquist14O.pdf

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

First Peoples Principles of Learning. FVES Learning Commons. Retrieved on October 5, 2021. https://fveslearningcommons.wordpress.com/indigenous-ways-of-knowing-first-peoples-principles/

Henning, G., Heiser, C., Lundquist., & Rice, A. (2021, May 20). Uncovering equity in everyday assessment practice. Assessment Update, 33(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/au.30252.

Hesse, B. W., Moser, R. P., & Riley, W. T. (2015). From big data to knowledge in the social sciences. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 659(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716215570007

Hundley, S. (2021, May). An equity conversation previewing the Equity-Centered Assessment Landscape Survey [Audio podcast]. Assessment Institute in Indianapolis. https://www.listennotes.com/podcasts/leading/s01e23-an-equity-gMUdzI8fVAZ/  

Johnson, R. B., & Schoonenboom, J. (2016). Adding qualitative and mixed methods research to health intervention studies: Interacting with differences. Qualitative Health Research, 26(5), 587–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617479

Kyriakides, L., Creemers, B., & Charalambous, E. (2018). Equity and quality dimensions in educational effectiveness. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. ISBN-10:3319720643

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Lundquist, A., & Heiser, C. (2020, August 21). Practicing equity-centered assessmentAnthology. https://www.anthology.com/blog/practicing-equity-centered-assessment

Mertens, D. M. (2018a). Mixed methods design in evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Mertens, D. M. (2018b). Trends, challenges, and advances in mixed methods evaluation. In
Mixed methods design in evaluation (pp. 175-182). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Mertens, D. M., & Wilson, A. T. (2012). Program evaluation theory and practice: A comprehensive guide. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Morse, J. M., & Niehaus, L. T. (2009). Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

Patton, M. Q. (2011). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. Guilford press.

Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155-169. https://www.cc.gatech.edu/fac/ellendo/rittel/rittel-dilemma.pdf

Sherer, D., Norman, J., Bryk, A.S., Peurach, D.J., Vasudeva, A., & McMahon, K. (2020). Evidence for improvement: An integrated analytic approach for supporting networks. Stanford, CA: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Stevens, S. S. (1959). Measurement, psychophysics, and utility. In C. W. Churchman and P. Ratoosh (eds.), Measurement: Definitions and theories. New York: John Wiley.

Suskie, L. (2014). Five dimensions of quality: A common sense guide to accreditation and accountability. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. ISBN-10:9781118761571

Trochim, W. M., Donnelly, J. P., & Arora, K. (2016). Research methods: The essential knowledge base (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning. ISBN-10:1133954774

University of Pittsburg. (n.d.). Improvement science: A crash course for Ed faculty and advisors [Video]. Vimeo.

W. K. Kellogg Foundation. (2014). Using logic models to bring together planning, evaluation, and action: Logic model development guide [PDF]. https://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/LogicModel.pdf

Wanzer, D. L. (Host). (2021, May). Beckner, C., Keith, C., & Yorger, S. (Producers). What is evaluation? Perspectives of how evaluation differs (or not) from research. Indiana University Assessment Institute. https://www.listennotes.com/podcasts/leading/s01e23-an-equity-gMUdzI8fVAZ/

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Educational Evaluation, Assessment, & Effectiveness Glossary Copyright © 2021 by Afaf Igbaria; Aishah Shubily; Amir Zargar A. Zargar; Ana Guillen; Ani Apyan; C. Monroy; Guillermo Lopez; Kimberly A Megyesi-Brem; Kolby Rousseve; Lavanya Jawaharlal; Levon Ghanimian; Lindsey T. Kunisaki; M. Harrington Clifford; Maureen Ruiz-Sundstrom; Melissa Soto; Michelle G. Cardenas; Ruby Ramirez-Murillo; Steve Flores; Sunny Le; Yuteng Wang; and Jasmine Zavala is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book